“Absolutely. For Albert’s goal, I’d make the assignment **5 separate trials** so you can directly calculate whether he met the “4 out of 5 trials” portion. You can copy and paste this prompt: > Create a **5-question reading comprehension assignment** for a student working at an **early elementary instructional reading level**. Each question should measure literal comprehension of a short sentence or very small passage. > > For **each of the 5 questions**: > > * Write **1–2 short, simple sentences** using familiar vocabulary. > * Include **one clear picture/visual that directly matches the sentence or passage**. > * Ask **one simple comprehension question** about what was read. > * Provide exactly **3 multiple-choice answer options**. > * Keep the answer choices to **one word or a very short phrase whenever possible**. > * Include only **one clearly correct answer**. > * Randomize the location of the correct answer so it is not always A, B, or C. > * Use questions such as **who, what, where, what happened, or what did the character do?** > * Do not require inferencing or outside knowledge. > > Make the worksheet **student-friendly, uncluttered, and visually accessible**, with large print and plenty of spacing between questions. > > At the bottom, include a **teacher data section** with: > > * Questions Correct: ___ / 5 > * Accuracy: ___ % > * Number of Verbal Prompts Used: ___ > * Met Criterion: Yes / No > > **Goal criterion:** The student should answer comprehension questions with **80% accuracy (4/5 correct)** while receiving **no more than 5 verbal prompts**. > > Do not provide the answers on the student worksheet. Include a separate **teacher answer key**. For Albert specifically, I’d start with passages like: **“The dog is in the box. The dog is brown.”** Then ask, **“Where is the dog?”** with three options such as *box / car / bed*. That keeps the task cleanly aligned to the IEP goal rather than accidentally measuring decoding difficulty or inferencing.”